Hell, they’re already fighting the us, so what’s another nato member. And, given that the us initiated this current round of hostilities, “nato attacked” might invalidate any defensive clause. Particularly if there’s any us facilities there involved. Which, unfortunately might include embassies, etc.
Countries or governments facing elimination aren’t the most rational actors.
Hell, they’re already fighting the us, so what’s another nato member. And, given that the us initiated this current round of hostilities, “nato attacked” might invalidate any defensive clause. Particularly if there’s any us facilities there involved. Which, unfortunately might include embassies, etc.
Countries or governments facing elimination aren’t the most rational actors.