> instead arguing the teen violated terms that prohibit discussing suicide or self-harm with the chatbot.
And what action did they take when he violated the terms? I am betting no action. That's really a point in favor of the plaintiff.
> instead arguing the teen violated terms that prohibit discussing suicide or self-harm with the chatbot.
And what action did they take when he violated the terms? I am betting no action. That's really a point in favor of the plaintiff.