> “Rather than disturbing my poor engineers and product people with what is half good ideas and half bad ideas, now I test it myself. I come say, ‘Look, I’ve actually made this work, this is how it works, what do you think, could we do it this way?’” he said.
Review implies the requested changes are made by the requestor, not the reviewer. Maybe article meant refactor, rewrite, or otherwise revise.
His company is gonna fold in the future anyway, so I don't think it matters much
over the wall engineering is poor practice, AI powered or not
An AI board would certainly fire a CEO of a $20 billion company who wastes their time doing little tweaking like that. I mean even if there'd be a perfect AI that does something beyond slop consistently, this would still be a waste of time for a CEO.
At least if this is true at all, which should be perhaps doubted a little bit.
Wonder what they say about the code. Or do they bite their tongues and make it work?