Bluntly I have my doubts on how "AI-savvy" the Google execs are based on how flat footed they seem to be with respect to releasing successful and compelling AI products.
Eg. I don't want Gemini to summarize a google doc, thats what the title and first paragraph do...
The execs need to try actually using AI and verifying the correctness or lack of it in the results, THEY need to be more savvy about what AI is able to do. And if the results are garbage, and it wastes time rather than saves time they must be using it wrong, right?
I suggest replacing execs with LLMs just to make sure we get the maximum value out of the technology
Enterprise software engineers have to be good with AI to know when it will save time deploying it.
Understanding where it’s effective and how to use AI tooling is a sought after skill.
I would advise programmers to understand an AI tooling stack that they know very well.
if I was working for google I'd resign. supremely irresponsible for them to push AI this hard, it is simply not capable of replacing engineers nor speeding them up considerably if they have to review all of its output. seems like all the devs will just be pushing AI slop into the repos and letting the poor fucker in charge of reviewing it take all the inevitable heat
unless their tooling is somehow lightyears ahead of market and doesn't constantly bullshit or write broken, insecure code...
Some of us have seen a couple of past AI waves and plenty other tech waves. Show me the money.. in the meantime we’ll get on with our jobs and wait for the other shoe to maybe drop.