The article speaks about an "ejection", where Google is completely silent on the topic. It proceeds by taking the Xorg majority opinion as gospel and depicting all reverts as necessary.
This isn't journalism. How about asking the other side?
The article speaks about an "ejection", where Google is completely silent on the topic. It proceeds by taking the Xorg majority opinion as gospel and depicting all reverts as necessary.
This isn't journalism. How about asking the other side?