The article sounds pretty disrespectful to both catastrophiles, and to the left-thinking journalists who depend on their clicks to keep their own jobs.
Why was it was printed in The Guardian? With a bit-different slant, it'd be a natural fit in The Spectator.
The article sounds pretty disrespectful to both catastrophiles, and to the left-thinking journalists who depend on their clicks to keep their own jobs.
Why was it was printed in The Guardian? With a bit-different slant, it'd be a natural fit in The Spectator.