> We may not yet have definitive evidence that we live in a simulation. But the deeper we look, the more our universe seems to behave like a computational process.
Does "simulation" unequivocally follow "computational"?
This article reminds me David Chalmers' "Reality+" book, it has many similar ideas
Isn’t that the point? If our simulation didn’t look like the universe, it wouldn’t be a very good one!
> We may not yet have definitive evidence that we live in a simulation. But the deeper we look, the more our universe seems to behave like a computational process.
Does "simulation" unequivocally follow "computational"?