Lots of loaded language here, but isn't the judge's verdict the same as Lewis's in the end?
A strange guy compelled to take risks with other people's money without their permission is a "criminal on the loose in the financial system".
Michael Lewis tries to explain himself, claims empathy for autistic people is the story here and not fraud at a ludicrous level.
Lots of loaded language here, but isn't the judge's verdict the same as Lewis's in the end?
A strange guy compelled to take risks with other people's money without their permission is a "criminal on the loose in the financial system".