Honest question: is the goal really to have a 50/50 split of men and women employed in the field? Because that's the general sense I get when the existing distribution numbers are cited. If so, why is that the goal?
And why is positive discrimination justified? Why not lift all the fingers off the scales and see where things end up?
Honest question: is the goal really to have a 50/50 split of men and women employed in the field? Because that's the general sense I get when the existing distribution numbers are cited. If so, why is that the goal?
And why is positive discrimination justified? Why not lift all the fingers off the scales and see where things end up?